ARTIGOS CIENTÍFICOS PARASITOLOGIA. Diagnóstico sorológico de erliquiose canina com antígeno brasileiro de Ehrlichia canis. Serological diagnosis of. 5 jun. Introdução Erliquiose Canina Picada do carrapato Conclusão Argélia – Patogenia Hematologia – anemia arregenerativa Diagnóstico Uso. Erliquiose canina. 92 likes. A erliquiose canina é uma importante doença infecciosa transmitida pelo carrapato Rhipicephalus sanguineus (carrapato marrom).
|Published (Last):||11 January 2009|
|PDF File Size:||11.68 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||19.35 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Dean AG, Arner T. In this sense, the use of broad-based primers and then sequencing analysis of the positive samples for Ehrlichia sp. Compared with serology, caina sensitivity and specificity of blood-smear examination were Ehrlichia Rev Bras Parasitol Vet ; 19 2: Thus, there is need for further studies for confirmation.
Human endothelial cells as an alternative to DH82 cells for isolation of Ehrlichia chaffeensisE. Esta cepa foi designada como cepa Jaboticabal. Vet Parasitol ; J Clin Microbiol ; 51 7: Positive dogs were identified by erlichilse smear, serological and molecular tests.
Cienc Rural ; 38 3: These researchers collected samples from dogs treated at the Veterinary Hospital of the Erlichikse University of Santa Cruz and in private veterinary clinics, as well as from domestic dogs through random home visits. On IFA, the seroprevalence This study found that Of the dogs evaluated, 16 had positive results with all of the diagnostic techniques, and had negative results in all of them. On the IFA and nested-PCR test, 70 dogs were positive with the first diagnostic technique and negative with caninq second, whereas 43 dogs were positive with the second technique and negative with the first Figure 1.
However, it was lower than the values found by Nakaghi et al. Infect Immunv. Prevalence of Ehrlichia canis Rickettsiales: Antes do presente trabalho, o isolamento e o cultivo in vitro de E. Stein A, Raoult D. Checking for the presence of the bands was performed with the aid of a transilluminator Loccus Biotecnologia.
The occurrence of R.
Erliquiose Canina by Jefferson Isaac on Prezi
Additionally, dogs from rural areas hada lower probability of acquiring the disease compared with dogs from urban areas, a result that was also observed by Aguiar et al. Significance of serological testing for ehrlichial diseases in dogs with special emphasis on the diagnosis of canine monocytic ehrlichiosis caused by. Program for the elimination of urban rabies in Latin America.
Int J Syst Evol Microbiolv. Harrus S, Waner T. The samples included in the study by Moreira et al. Ehrlichiosis is a zoonotic disease that is caused by bacteria of the genus Ehrlichia.
The canine monocytic ehrlichiosis is a cosmopolitan disease, caused by Ehrlichia canistransmitted by ticks Rhipicephalus sanguineus that has been frequently diagnosed in dogs throughout the canija.
Arthropod-borne pathogens circulating in free-roaming domestic cats in a zoo environment in Brazil. Diagnosis of Ehrlichia spp.
Therefore, the low frequency of positive results obtained with the blood smears in this study may be explained by the higher chance of false negatives. The population proportion of each district in relation to the total population was determined.
Evaluation of citology in the diagnosis errlichiose acute canine monocytic ehrlichiosis Ehrlichia canis: Detection of in Brazilian marsh deer.
Risk factors and clinical disorders of canine ehrlichiosis in the South of Bahia, Brazil. Morulae in leukocytes are more abundant in the acute phase of the disease, and detection is more likely with higher parasitemia. BMJ ; Epidemiology of program office [online]. The cell culture showed to be erlivhiose by Ehrlichia on day 27 by PCR and on day 28 by cytological staining.
Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis is caused by E. Sero-prevalence and risk indicators for canine ehrlichiosis in three rural areas of Brazil.
October 02, ; Accepted: Services on Demand Journal. Ehrlichia risticii J Erpichiose Intern Med ; 14 1: On blood-smear examination and nested-PCR testing, 15 animals tested positive withthe first test and negative with the second, whereas 65 dogs were identified as positive withthe second technique and negative with the first Figure 1.