Gary Zukav’s timeless, humorous, New York Times bestselling masterpiece, The Dancing Wu Li Masters, is arguably the most widely acclaimed. The Dancing. Wu Li Masters. An Overview of the New Physics. Gary Zukav. A BANTAM NEW AGE BOOK. BANTAM BOOKS. NEW YORK • TORONTO • LONDON. The Dancing Wu Li Masters differs quite a bit from The Holographic Universe, but there is also a lot of . In short, Gary Zukav has written a very good book.

Author: Zulukus Kadal
Country: Armenia
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Music
Published (Last): 19 November 2015
Pages: 175
PDF File Size: 8.54 Mb
ePub File Size: 15.95 Mb
ISBN: 246-8-20086-437-3
Downloads: 94056
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Zulkinos

His humor is cloying and totally unnecessary.

The Dancing Wu Li Masters

Einstein doesnt like it. Mar 05, Nick Wallace rated it did not like it. The reason this is important is that, in general, a wave function that has the special property Zukav talks about of being a product of individual wave functions for each dqncing of the system only has that property in a particular basis; if we change to a different basis the zukkav will no longer hold.

This masteds somewhat of a pun as there are many other Chinese characters that could be rendered as “wu li” in atonal pinyinand chapters of the book are each titled with alternative translations of Wu Lisuch as “Nonsense”, “My Way” and “I Clutch My Ideas”. Hawking rushes through the history of physics so you really need Zukav as a primer. If this is really where Zukav thinks the new physics has overthrown old ideas, he has widely missed the mark.

The Dancing Wu Li Masters – Wikipedia

They do not have a liberal arts mentality because of their education, they choose a liberal arts education because it gratifies their liberal arts mental set. Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. He barely mentions quark theory at all, and electroweak theory only in a brief footnote, where he says that “recent evidence gives growing credence” to that theory, a considerable understatement in given that it was the very year Weinberg, Salam, and Glashow received the Nobel Prize for it, the experiments which decisively confirmed the theory having been completed in Wave functions do not exist in the ordinary three-dimensional space that we perceive; they exist in an abstract mathematical space called Hilbert space.

Well, probably saved fo Physics used to be my favourite subject in my pre-engineering career sadly, Engineering did kill that part in me which thought academic study can be someone’s career. But you will also be presented with a philosophy about the physics which is not the only possible one, and is certainly not necessitated by the physics, but which is presented as though it were just as well established as the physics; and you won’t be able to tell which is which without information from other sources, because Zukav does not distinguish the two.


Among other things, it was verified by the experience of the Apollo astronauts on their way to and from the Moon. Breaking the news to the great uneducated public is something Zukav does well. Quantum logic above mathematics and language The book is full of these difficult bits – and it helped that I took lots of notes all along the book.

View all 21 comments. In short, what we experience is not external reality, but our interaction with it. At times he’s so eager to jump to the scientific and philosophical ramifications of quantum mechanics that he sprints past the reader’s understanding.

Great introduction to physics for someone who has no idea how it applies to everyday life. At the time of first publication of this bookexperiments had been done the main one being the Clauser experiment which Zukav mentions that were consistent with the predictions of quantum mechanics, but still left some “loopholes” for theorists who were unwilling to accept the full implications.

Zukav argues that experiencing reality through, perhaps, meditation and eastern religious metaphors, may lead to a greater degree of “knowing” or enlightenment, as the case may be. Zukav’s last statement about the old physics, that it says “the external world is indifferent to us and to our needs”, helps us to see more clearly where Zukav is coming from.

This is not “that-which-is”. By my comments so far I have certainly placed myself into the first group, whereas Zukav, by his own admission, belongs to the second.

A token of gratitude would kindly inquire something about you. National Book Award for Science Paperback Basically, quantum mechanics argues we know really nothing about the essence of reality, so anything could be and maybe anything in mastere is th. But don’t rewrite the history of physics to back up your case, it doesn’t work.

I was in college at the time, and I borrowed a copy of Zukav’s book to see if Hofstadter’s criticisms seemed accurate. However, he is not the first to do that either, and he is quite willing to discuss his famous predecessors in this endeavor, including such founders of the field as Bohr, Heisenberg, and Pauli.

I talked above l Bohm’s pilot wave model and what parts of his views may or may not have been received with skepticism; here I want to talk about all those people who would give his views a sympathetic reception because they’ve turned their backs on science. Can never know too much about quantum physics. That is not to say that a lay person can get no value from reading this book.


Gary’s gentle humor, sensitivity, and deep insights have endeared him to millions of readers and listeners. This zykav [of not having found a truly inertial coordinate system] is related to relativity, which is the problem of determining absolute nonmotion, in an intimate way.

Dancing Wu Li Masters: An Overview of the New Physics (Perennial Classics)

Gary Zukavif he had written the previous sentence, would have replaced the word “ironically Dancin to the Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, it is impossible to know both the exact position and momentum of a particle: What we believe is based upon our perceptions.

And since string theory is the “final” theory, it really should come last anyway. What was the point of the book? I said I wouldn’t discuss Zukav’s philosophy per se, but I can’t let this quote go by without comment:. Only when Zukav makes large leaps into philosophy, full of holes and gafy and “logical” ruling-out of other possible explanations despite a sukav chapter praising Einstein for approaching physics with a beginner’s mind not bothered with traditional conclusions of what is and is not possibledoes he stumble.

Apr 30, Danelley rated it it was amazing. And the best that Zukav can do is to say that, well, these so-called new ideas must really be the old ideas after all. He will never be able to compare his picture with the real mechanism and he cannot even imagine the possibility or w meaning of such a comparison.

When most people say “scientist”, they mean “technician”. His views are also shared, at least to an extent, by some contemporary physicists and philosophers, many of whom are named in the Acknowledgments to the book, and who read over it at Zukav’s request–some only parts, but at least four read the entire manuscript and offered extensive comments. A frightening story about how careful you need to be with popular science texts.

And I’m so happy I got to the end – lii this book is brilliant. Refresh and try again. The distinction he draws may be useful when trying to understand what he calls the communication problem between the two groups ,i C.