Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians has 51 ratings and 0 reviews. Ibn Taymiyya, one of the greatest and most prolific thinkers of. Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians by Ibn Taymiyyah, , available at Book Depository with free delivery worldwide. Ibn Taymiyya, Against the Greek Logicians Introduction and translation by Wael B . Hallaq Oxford: Clarendon Press, Iviii + p. Show all authors.

Author: Shaktishicage Gukazahn
Country: Peru
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Software
Published (Last): 15 July 2011
Pages: 214
PDF File Size: 18.22 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.44 Mb
ISBN: 577-6-20113-355-1
Downloads: 62613
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Mazuramar

Ibn Taymiyya against the Greek Logicians

The necessary accidental, on the other hand, is concomitant with the quiddity but does not constitute a part of it. Their argument that what they have considered to be essential is conceived by the mind first 1 is false on two grounds. Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians. The number of transmitters of any one piece of information is large enough taymiya preclude the possibility of transmitters colluding on a lie or a forgery. In the external world there simply exists no such arrangement. It is also not an exaggeration to maintain that Ibn Taymiyya was an ardent sceptic, but a sceptic who was saved by religion.

In this case, the word ‘dates’ and its real definition remain wider than the objective, external reality of busr.

Oxford University Press is a department of the University of Oxford. The source of their error is that they think that before its coming into existence a thing can be the object of knowledge and intention, and can be distinguished as being capable or incapable of existence, etc. Being so extraneous, they are present in the mind of individuals to varying degrees. The conventions of language also involve another use of nominal essences relative to the special circumstances of individuals using words or referring to things.

For arguing that it does amounts, in effect, to saying that ‘the hearer cannot apprehend the meaning until he has heard and apprehended the word, but he will not understand what the word means until he has first understood the meaning’.

The sterility of the syllogism for studying natura rerum is then to be attributed to a problematic inherent, not in the formal structure of the argument, but rather in the epistemic value of the premiss which is claimed to be universal.


Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians – Wael B. Hallaq – Oxford University Press

I will only argue that one way againsh of this dilemma might lie in establishing a chronology for Ibn Taymiyya’s relevant works. It’s only in hardback and thus really pricey. Zayd rated it really liked it Dec 16, Those w h o studied it he likened to p e o p l e eating lobsters, w h o take a great deal of trouble for the sake of a little thhe of meat e n v e l o p e d in much shell. It is therefore either impossible for them [to form concepts] in accordance with what they agains stipulated, or it is possible but without attaining what they have sought.

A more readily identifiable source of influence is the polemical writings of the theologians, who, like Ibn Taymiyya, had earlier stood in defence of Islam against the ‘Greek heresies’.

Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians : Ibn Taymiyyah :

A third characteristic feature of his work is the imbalance between the criticism he advanced why lP is Q’ is false and the agzinst he proposed as a substitute for what he thought false why ‘P is 5’ is true.

But what makes analogy and the syllogism equal? That the work carries the insignia of Clarendon Press, Oxford is a further testimony of its enduring value.

The Problem of Definition agaijst Islamic Logic: Apart from ihn of Muslim thought, specialists in philosophies and historians of logic are sure to benefit from this sterling effort. Sign in to use this feature. Thus, the very nominatum, or its equivalent, is pointed out accordingly. In just a few instances, however, I deemed it necessary to give my own translation. In this doctrine, God becomes the universe, and the universe becomes God, and whatever attribute one lgoicians to attach to created beings will be equally predicable of God.

I am immeasurably indebted to Michael Marmura, of the University of Toronto, for his penetrating remarks on difficult parts of the text treating of metaphysics. This knowledge he considered beneficial because it is knowledge of God and of all mundane matters that are necessary for man to lead a lawful shar’i life.


Ibn Taymiyya Against the Greek Logicians

If the form is irrelevant, and if the so- called universal premiss in the syllogism is not really universal, then how does the syllogism differ from analogy? Fourth, until this very day people are not known to have definitions which accord with their principles.

The universal and abstract mental meaning, Ibn Taymiyya seems to be saying, is identical with the verbal utterance and the written word that stand for that meaning. Print Save Cite Email Share. Isaac Gbenga hreek it it was ok Nov 16, If all the premisses upon which the knowledge of the conclusion depends are to be mentioned, then the number of premisses may be only one or it may exceed ten.

Find it on Scholar. Third, we maintain that if a definition gives a concept of the definiendum, the concept will not be formed until the validity of the definition is established, because the definition is the evidence of the concept and the means by which it is formed and brought to light.

To Proceed, I have always known that Greek logic is neither needed by the intelligent nor of any use to the dullard. His profound grasp of the discussions in medieval Arabic works on logic is evident here and in that regard it is an important book.

However, these fragments shed no light on what is presumed to have been a more systematic critique of Aristotelian logic. Taaymiyya, the logicians define the definiendum by means of attributes they call essential and accidental. See Naqd al- Mantiq,where Ibn Taymiyya rephrases the argument. Universality in so far as it is universality, being a logical construct, was generally considered to exist only in the mind without having any ontological status externally. Naqd al-Mantiq,; Jahd,Translation, pars.